0 |
7 |
14
It has nothing to do with superficiality or psychopathy. It's unironically the fact that poor genetics have been allowed to exist through unnatural means for far too long. The multiple industrial revolutions in more recent history and all kinds of technological advancements over thousands of years have supported this and created the problem for everyone in the first place.
For most of human history only around 30-40% of males were able to reproduce, at some times it's even been suggested that 1 in 17 men ever reproduced at all. Things such as enforced monogamy, arranged marriage and advances in decreasing mortality rates among many other things were to push for higher rates of production, but now we are paying the toll for this because we are overpopulated and dysgenic as a species. Just look at India and China as perfect examples of this. They are old civilizations who experienced amazing stability and favorable circumstances for thousands of years thanks to interfering with the natural course of life. But now they are in an unfavorable position where the overwhelming majority of their population are left with poor genetics and are suffocating under their own weight.
The brutal blackpill is that feminism is actually doing the world a massive favor. Rather than reproducing with subhumans who should not even be alive, they are using natural discretion and selecting the male bloodlines that SHOULD survive. The reality is if you were undesired by women as a teenager in your peak years, you literally should not even be alive. That doesn't make you weak or a bad person, it is just that you were a victim of greedy people that only ever valued you and your more recent ancestors as slaves to produce for the chads on top.
The solution to resolve all of this is not to create more unnecessary suffering by expecting women to settle for "below average" men a.k.a dysgenic men, but to allow nature to balance out and just leave women to reproduce with who they want. If you are one of those men, great. If you are not, it is what it is.
we have absolutely regressed as a species as a result of almost 2 millenia of strict monotheistic sexual monogamy. Every short, ugly, bald freak was guaranteed a breeding sow as long as he completed his daily menial tasks. That is not how its supposed to go. All the diseases that have become endemic in modern societies are the result of a lack of selective pressure on the gene pool. Therefore, what is happening right now is actually just a natural reaction of females to the physical degeneracy of the average human.
Its just nature correcting itself. Now I can understand that subhumans are raging, after all the system still uses their labour to sustain itself without giving them their promised breeding sow. This will indeed be a problem to be adressed but maybe Al and robots could replace 90% of jobs in the future, So that humans can just lean back and enjoy being human.
i can just smell tails here... also there is no balancing out from nature. nature doesnt need everybody to look a certain way. if ugly indians managed to reproduce by arranged marriage or waiting until they are 40 thats also nature. right now we just see a selection which fits your, lets say aestethic ideals, (not saying it is wrong or right) but thats because we live in a society where that is possible. but still just because netherlands for example had a very selective dating market for the last few hundred years which made them from smallest to tallest doesnt mean that this is superior to an arab dating market where its just camels = more kids. I am certanly not trying to say which one is better. even tho i definetlly would prefer a european one instead of such an arab one. (altough i think in this day and age its a bit disgusting in europe maybe like 40 years ago idk i wasnt born but still). im just saying its hard to argue with morals like that you know what im saying? there is no real definition of poor genetics. esxcept maybe not reproducing. but i get what you mean. you have a preferrence towards your own good which is healthy
I see you are from bangladesh, You said ugly indians reproducing through arranged marriage is also nature, we are not in an era when your children can choose his looks before he was born, you have to consider that, I am from the philippines, and I dont think my child would be proud if he was born with poor genetics and shit phenotype, so I decided to not reproduce because I still have my own morality that I should follow, I guess if humans are shapeshifters and can change their physical appearance that easily, It would be easier and less brutal, but fuck my life man.
your child would love to be born even if it is ugly... Life is such a crazy gift you just dont understand it.
Nah you just cant dictate my life, sorry brotha might just try to maximise myself and focus on other things, there is more to life than reproduction and I should not be a two dimensional person, thanks for engaging.
Lol your just self hating. Also i never even tried to dictate your life. Reproduction is the deepest form of creation and your just prohibiting yourself from that...
the reason most men look under average is because woman decide that. they also think that because of social media etc and hypergamy ofc. but lets say we are in 3000 BC no society, woman could be even more hypergamic because polygamy etc. then with the start of societies it might have "balanced" out. so monogamy became more widespread (maybe also by force). today its shifting again kind of to hypergamy i guess because of feminism and all that. you know what im sayin? in cavemen times average men was probably alright looking because under average died out. in medieval to ww1 times average man was average looking because no crazy social media ideas and woman were forced to not be hypergamous. today men under average because woman are more free= hypergamous and social media. also it is mostly young woman who are hypergamous. the average and even under average dude will reproduce eveentuelly. you know what im sayn???
The problem is that the average and even under average dude despite having an ability to reproduce, dont maximize their children's genetic potential, like embryo screening and polygenic scores, but yeah there is no such thing as poor genetics as long as you dont give a fuck about foids, Even I dont give a horse crap about foids tbh, Once I experienced having sex with an escort, I wont really give a shit about getting a gf anymore, that is my way of coping about me having a poor genetics, but at what costs if I just dont have a desire to procreate, I should find meaning in life beyond procreation.
probably the only poor genetics are those that dont procreate. believe it or not if lets say ronaldo has 3 kids he will be outperformed by a mexican with 6 daughters. you not caring about reproducing is the biggest sign of weak genetics. because you allowed it to yourself to hate yourself that much so you dont reproduce.
Still life is more than spamming 12 kids, and I am focusing more on my enlightenment than spamming 12 kids that I dont even give a shit, life is more than procreation and I aint letting someone dictate my life just because they are smarter, this is my life brotha and I would rather find meaning in life aside from procreation
I never said life is only about reproduction... It is just a big part and even then the fact that you are prohibiting yourself one of the most innate things of every species ever speaks volumes... You are trying to destroy your life. I never said dont find fullfilment in other areas.
