race theories from what ive read goes back to darwinistic and racist evolution theoriest that come from the interpretation that life is driven by natural selection and reactive forces (forces that are not pushed to their limits; in deleuzean words, reactive force is a force that cannot act directly , it can only define itself through opposition to something else- (nietzsche and philosophy)

from what way i understand darwinism is that his theory is mainly about survival, but in actually looking at animals and thier history, i think theres something innerly, that drives the evolution process, now since im already deep into nietzschean terms, it could be explained simply through will to power, but using examples is key, but firstly i want to say why i dont like natural selection, its mainly bc i think its a negative, natural selection says that nature simply removes the unfit, and not generate a new feature? which would make the humans consioussness not even possible, its a backwards way of life, natural selection theory is just Schopenhauerian, if we look at the evolution of specie through nietzsches framework, it would be the overflow of power or the excess of it that makes evolution possible, thus the healthy organism is the one that overflows in its specie, so producing more force then surviving

now to the example/s, i will use some humans bc its relavent to the title's name, the best example i found is in ordered subjects like math, now math serves no survival purpose, women wouldnt prefer children that know math instead of not knowing math, it thus serves no evolutionary purpose according to darwinism? even looking at some animals with gian antlers, by pure adaption/darwin logic, this is unneccessary

now after establishing darwinism is cope, its to what the thread is for, the appearence of regions and peoples are determined by factors like enviroment, history and the conditions of life, like a pheno that lived in a certain area and enviroment for a long time would have a effect on the specie, not just physically ofc but through how forces and drives are stylized in that group

but since we are not thinking darwinistic, this is not just muh natural selection its more of the history of force relations( the strenght of the forces to other forces, etc,,, read nietzsche and philosophy by deleuze for more context on what i mean)

but what i cant stress enough, and this is why i hesitated posting this is misinterpretation of this, bc no configuration is higher or lower then the other, bc each pheno is a complete expression of the set of certain forces in their respective situation

the point against nationalistic and racial hierarchy thought is that it ranks these forces on a scale of more evolved/better life

so its then reactive

so with this i think i can confidently our perception of beauty is the appearance of configuration of the active forces into expressing its forces fully, that nothing is being held back by disease, parasites, or deficiency as in most places where "ugliness is the norm", so with this it can be shown why certain regions of europe are uglier then other, bc of the forces being internally spent as result of diseases, etc.. like certain phenotypes history are riddled with issues that held their active forces back

in nature, the lion is a example of a active force apparent, meanwhile on the other hand, a ugly creature like the parasite is reactive